Data is currently being updated. Some features may be temporarily unstable.

Disease Profile

Bacterial

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection

产志贺毒素大肠杆菌感染

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC/VTEC) infection is a bacterial infection used in cross-country surveillance and is an important cause of outbreaks and sporadic diarrhoeal disease, including bloody diarrhoea and haemorrhagic colitis [1][2]. It is especially relevant because it can precipitate haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), a thrombotic microangiopathy with intravascular hemolysis and acute renal injury [1][3]. Surveillance interpretations should therefore consider both uncomplicated gastrointestinal illness and post-infectious renal complications [1][3].

Definition

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection refers to infection with E. coli strains that produce Shiga toxin, also described as verotoxin-producing E. coli in the surveillance description [disease]. The literature provided identifies STEC as the primary cause of typical HUS and links it to a syndrome of microvascular injury and hemolysis [3][1]. The entity is also coded in the supplied metadata as ICD-10 A04.3 and ICD-11 1A03 [disease].

Clinical features

The main clinical manifestation described in the sources is diarrhoea, which may be bloody in about 60% of patients, and the reported median incubation period is three days [1]. STEC can also cause haemorrhagic colitis and the diarrhoea-associated form of HUS [2]. HUS is defined in the provided material as a triad of mechanical hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute renal injury, and one report notes nephrological and neurological thrombotic microangiopathy in a STEC-positive child [1][3]. HUS is reported in 5-15% of STEC infections, and in the literature review 73% of HUS cases required kidney replacement therapy [1][3].

Epidemiology

STEC infection has major outbreak potential and is described as a leading cause of HUS in children [1]. The sources note a shift in epidemiology since the early 2010s, with decline of the historically predominant O157 serogroup and emergence of non-O157 STEC, especially O26 and O80 in France [1]. The 2010 reference states that STEC infections occur worldwide and are a major public-health concern because some non-O157 strains can cause illness comparable in severity to O157-associated disease [2]. The literature also indicates that STEC is zoonotic and distributed among domestic and wildlife animal species, with human infection linked to contaminated food, water, and animal or human contact [2][1].

Transmission

Transmission occurs through ingestion of contaminated food or water, person-to-person spread, and contact with ruminants or their contaminated environment [1]. Another source also describes transmission through contact with infected animals or people and emphasizes a zoonotic character [2]. No source-backed detail on dose, environmental persistence, or seasonality is available in the supplied material.

Risk groups

Children are the group most clearly highlighted in the provided sources, both because STEC is described as the leading cause of HUS in children and because one review found 73% of reported atypical HUS cases initially classified as typical were pediatric [1][3]. The material also suggests heightened relevance for persons with exposure to contaminated food or water, ruminants, or their contaminated environments, as well as those with contact with infected animals or people [1][2]. Source-backed detail on other specific high-risk groups is not yet available.

Prevention

The supplied sources do not provide a formal prevention schedule or vaccine-related guidance, but they do support prevention through exposure control focused on contaminated food, water, animals, and contaminated environments [1][2]. Because person-to-person spread is documented, hygiene and interruption of direct transmission are relevant public-health measures [1]. Source-backed detail on additional preventive interventions is not yet available.

Surveillance note

In surveillance, STEC should be read as a syndrome-capable pathogen with both gastroenteric and post-infectious renal outcomes, not solely as a diarrhoeal infection [1][3]. The sources support continued clinical and bacteriological surveillance, including stool testing for Shiga toxins and STEC, because outbreaks are important and HUS may follow infection [1]. STEC positivity does not exclude atypical HUS when the presentation is atypical, so surveillance interpretation may need to distinguish microbiological detection from the full clinical syndrome [3].

References
  1. 1 Bruyand M et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. Med Mal Infect. 2018 May. PMID: 29054297. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2017.09.012. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29054297/
  2. 2 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli. Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America. 2010. doi: 10.2174/978160805192211001010065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/978160805192211001010065
  3. 3 Mortari G et al. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection as a precipitating factor for atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Feb. PMID: 39347991. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06480-9. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39347991/
  4. 4 Freedman SB et al. Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infection, Antibiotics, and Risk of Developing Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 15. PMID: 26917812. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw099. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26917812/
  5. 5 Shiga Toxin--Producing Escherichia coli Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2004. doi: 10.1086/383473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/383473
  6. 6 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 1999. doi: 10.1016/s0196-4399(00)90001-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-4399(00)90001-1
Coding Register
ICD-10
A04.3
ICD-11
1A03
Key Statistics
Total cases
132K
Peak month
2025-08
Coverage
7 reporting countries · 2000-01-01 → 2026-06-20

Figure 1 | Full historical trajectories across all reporting countries.

Figure 2 | Year-over-year monthly comparison for seasonality and structural shifts.

Dataset Archive

Supplementary Data | Multi-country disease dataset

Machine-readable multi-country disease dataset (JSON/CSV) with source metadata.

Rows
2,739
Data Version
2026-06-20
Coverage
Included metadata
Source links, scope, cadence

Source Register

Official sources and update cadences used to construct the downloadable dataset.

AU
Australia NINDSSmonthlymicrosoft_bi

Australia

Australian national notifiable diseases surveillance dashboard.

Official source
CH
Switzerland FOPH IDDweeklyrest_api

Switzerland

Switzerland FOPH/BAG IDD mandatory reporting API normalized to national case rows. Monthly series may use the dashboard CHFL aggregate where CH-only monthly series are not exposed.

Official source
HK
Hong Kong, China CHP Notifiable Diseasesmonthlyopen_data_csv

Hong Kong, China

Hong Kong, China CHP annual notifiable infectious disease CSVs normalized to national monthly totals

Official source
JP
JP NIID Weeklyweeklyweb

Japan

Japan weekly infectious disease surveillance via NIID/JIHS.

Official source
KR
Korea KDCA EIDmonthlyopen_api_or_portal_download

South Korea

Korea KDCA notifiable infectious disease OpenAPI or portal/KOSIS downloads aggregated to national monthly notification counts.

Official source
TW
Taiwan, China CDC NIDSSmonthlyopen_data_csv

Taiwan, China

Taiwan, China monthly notifiable infectious disease open-data CSV feed.

Official source
US
US CDC NNDSSweeklyapi

United States

CDC National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System provisional data.

Official source
Suggested presentation pattern: cite the data version and coverage window when exporting charts or tables for publication.