Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessInfluenza

Induction of Cross-Reactive Hemagglutination Inhibiting Antibody and Polyfunctional CD4+ T-Cell Responses by a Recombinant Matrix-M–Adjuvanted Hemagglutinin Nanoparticle Influenza Vaccine

Clinical Infectious Diseases·

Vivek Shinde, Rongman Cai, Joyce Plested, Iksung Cho, Jamie Fiske, Xuan Pham, Mingzhu Zhu, Shane Cloney-Clark, Nan Wang, Haixia Zhou, Bin Zhou, Nita Patel, Michael J Massare, Amy Fix, Michelle Spindler, David Nigel Thomas, Gale Smith, Louis Fries, Gregory M Glenn

DOI
10.1093/cid/ciaa1673
PMID
33146720
PMCID
PMC8664440
OpenAlex
W3096456697
Study type
Randomised controlled trial
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The paper is relevant to influenza vaccine development, especially efforts to improve breadth of immune responses against homologous and drifted strains in older adults. It may be useful for literature review on vaccine immunogenicity and tolerability, but it does not establish real-world effectiveness.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study asked whether a Matrix-M-adjuvanted recombinant hemagglutinin quadrivalent nanoparticle influenza vaccine was safe and immunogenic in healthy adults aged 65 years or older.

Study design

This was a randomized, observer-blind, comparator-controlled trial comparing qNIV with trivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine and quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine. The trial assessed safety and immunogenicity.

Population and setting

Healthy adults aged 65 years or older were enrolled. A total of 1,375 participants were randomized, vaccinated, and followed in the trial.

Main findings

The adjuvanted qNIV produced stronger wild-type hemagglutination-inhibition responses than unadjuvanted qNIV for 5 of 6 homologous or drifted strains. The 75 µg Matrix-M formulation also showed higher responses than IIV3-HD for several A/H3N2 strains, similar responses to IIV3-HD for A/H1N1 and B Victoria strains, and similar responses to RIV4 across the strains tested; it also generated larger influenza HA-specific polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell fold increases than either comparator. Reported adverse event frequencies were similar across groups.

Public-health relevance

The paper is relevant to influenza vaccine development, especially efforts to improve breadth of immune responses against homologous and drifted strains in older adults. It may be useful for literature review on vaccine immunogenicity and tolerability, but it does not establish real-world effectiveness.

Important limitations

The summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata, so details from the full paper are unavailable for decision-grade interpretation. The abstract reports immunogenicity and safety findings, not clinical protection outcomes.

GIDS interpretation

This article is discoverable as a peer-reviewed randomized influenza vaccine trial in older adults and is contextually relevant to vaccine literature indexing. It should be treated as a study of immunogenicity and tolerability rather than as evidence of a live surveillance signal.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 10 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design