Social Judgment of the Polish Government Policy to Support Enterprises during Pandemic COVID-19 – An Analysis of Financial Shields
Przegląd Politologiczny·
- DOI
- 10.14746/pp.2026.31.2.9
- PMID
- —
- PMCID
- —
- OpenAlex
- W7203776765
- Study type
- Journal article
- Publisher
- Adam Mickiewicz University Poznan
- Article type
- journal-article
- Integrity
- current
Why this research matters now
The findings document policy responses aimed at mitigating economic consequences of pandemic-related disruptions, including effects on employment and business continuity.
Structured evidence summary
Research question
The study examines how enterprise owners in Poland judge the government's anti-crisis support policy during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically its contribution to reducing economic impact.
Study design
Survey and desk research methods were used to collect, analyze, and process data from existing sources to evaluate governmental support policy.
Population and setting
The study population consisted of enterprise owners in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
Main findings
Anti-crisis shields were judged as an important form of economy-wide support during the pandemic. Despite governmental costs, the shields helped reduce unemployment and maintain enterprise liquidity, and support was well received among enterprises even with partially ineffective aid fund allocation.
Public-health relevance
The findings document policy responses aimed at mitigating economic consequences of pandemic-related disruptions, including effects on employment and business continuity.
Important limitations
This summary relies on the supplied single-article abstract and bibliographic metadata. The original paper is required for decision-grade interpretation of methods, sample characteristics, and generalizability.
GIDS interpretation
This article was identified through classifier links to COVID-19, Poland, and health policy topics. It provides context on economic policy responses during the pandemic but does not report infectious disease outcomes or epidemiological measures.
Related GIDS surveillance
Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.
Evidence relationships
This article has 7 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.