Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessH5N1Influenza

A case of avian influenza A(H5N1) in England, January 2022

Eurosurveillance·

Isabel Oliver, Jonathan Roberts, Colin S Brown, Alexander MP Byrne, Dominic Mellon, Rowena DE Hansen, Ashley C Banyard, Joe James, Matthew Donati, Robert Porter, Joanna Ellis, Jade Cogdale, Angie Lackenby, Meera Chand, Gavin Dabrera, Ian H Brown, Maria Zambon

DOI
10.2807/1560-7917.es.2022.27.5.2200061
PMID
35115075
PMCID
PMC8815099
OpenAlex
W4210260727
Study type
Genomic study
Publisher
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Proactive monitoring protocols and routine diagnostic sampling proved valuable for evaluating community exposure risks and guiding clinical responses. These operational insights remain pertinent as viral circulation patterns continue to evolve.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

This report examines the clinical presentation and transmission potential of a suspected human infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) following direct exposure to poultry.

Study design

The investigation utilizes a single-case observational framework combined with targeted contact tracing and environmental sampling of associated livestock.

Population and setting

The primary subject is an asymptomatic adult maintaining a residential duck flock in England, alongside eleven identified close contacts and twenty tested birds.

Main findings

Virological testing confirmed the presence of the virus in both the human host and nineteen out of twenty examined birds. Systematic monitoring of all identified associates detected zero subsequent infections or onward spread. The analysis underscores the utility of proactive screening and routine testing during shifting viral patterns.

Public-health relevance

Proactive monitoring protocols and routine diagnostic sampling proved valuable for evaluating community exposure risks and guiding clinical responses. These operational insights remain pertinent as viral circulation patterns continue to evolve.

Important limitations

No explicit methodological constraints are detailed within the provided text. Consequently, this overview relies exclusively on the submitted abstract and bibliographic records, necessitating access to the full manuscript for comprehensive evaluation.

GIDS interpretation

Indexing tags such as genomic epidemiology, outbreak investigation, and transmission dynamics facilitate targeted retrieval within specialized literature databases. These classification markers situate the publication within standard public health reporting taxonomies rather than indicating real-time alert generation.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 10 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topichas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design