Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessInfluenza

Australian adults' views on influenza vaccination: Implications for communication and service quality from a qualitative study

Vaccine·

Maria Christou-Ergos, Majdi M. Sabahelzain, Katarzyna T. Bolsewicz, Jessica Kaufman, Maryke Steffens, Margie Danchin, Julie Leask

DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128846
PMID
42314308
PMCID
OpenAlex
W7165199186
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Immunization programs may achieve higher enrollment by aligning educational campaigns with accessible, patient-focused service models.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

What factors shape Australian adults' decisions regarding seasonal influenza immunization, and what support structures do they require?

Study design

A qualitative investigation utilizing individual interviews evaluated through a standardized thematic framework.

Population and setting

A cohort of fifteen Australian residents selected via purposive sampling techniques facilitated by a commercial recruitment firm.

Main findings

Respondents highlighted that effective outreach requires precise information dissemination and reliable dialogue opportunities with medical providers. They also stressed that logistical barriers, including cost and scheduling flexibility, significantly impact participation rates.

Public-health relevance

Immunization programs may achieve higher enrollment by aligning educational campaigns with accessible, patient-focused service models.

Important limitations

The analysis relies on a restricted participant pool of fifteen individuals, which constrains the broader applicability of the identified themes.

GIDS interpretation

This publication situates behavioral drivers and systemic access challenges within the Australian context, offering a reference point for understanding regional communication gaps.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 8 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventioninforms policy domainstudied instudied population settinguses study design