Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessSARSCOVID-19

Effectiveness of Omicron JN.1 vaccination against infection with JN.1-derived SARS-CoV-2 subvariants in a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

Vaccine·

Anne J. Huiberts, Dirk Eggink, Brechje de Gier, Thimon Karens, Hester E. de Melker, Susan J.M. Hahné, Diederick E. Grobbee, Janneke H.H.M. van de Wijgert, Susan van den Hof, Mirjam J. Knol

DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.129030
PMID
42585808
PMCID
OpenAlex
W7202283909
Study type
Cohort study
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The findings indicate that JN.1 vaccination provided limited additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection during a low-incidence period, with modest effectiveness observed in both age groups. The results contribute to understanding the real-world performance of updated COVID-19 vaccines against emerging subvariants.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study estimated vaccine effectiveness of JN.1 COVID-19 vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection, including effectiveness against specific JN.1-derived subvariants KP.3.1.1 and XEC.

Study design

Prospective cohort study (VASCO) conducted in the Netherlands from September 2024 to February 2025. Participants completed questionnaires and serology testing, performed self-tests, and infection variants were identified through whole genome sequencing. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated using Cox regression with time-varying exposure and multinomial logistic regression with calendar-week matching, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.

Population and setting

The cohort included JN.1 vaccine-eligible individuals: those aged 60 years and older, and those under 60 with medical risk conditions or healthcare workers. A total of 23,839 participants were analyzed, with vaccination uptake of 29% in the under-60 group and 74% in the 60-and-older group.

Main findings

During the five-month period, 2,142 infections occurred. Vaccine effectiveness was 16% in participants under 60 years and 13% in those 60 and older. No significant difference in effectiveness was detected between KP.3.1.1 and XEC subvariants, though point estimates suggested potentially lower protection against XEC.

Public-health relevance

The findings indicate that JN.1 vaccination provided limited additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection during a low-incidence period, with modest effectiveness observed in both age groups. The results contribute to understanding the real-world performance of updated COVID-19 vaccines against emerging subvariants.

Important limitations

The study had low statistical power to detect differences in vaccine effectiveness between subvariants. The analysis was conducted during a period of low SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Most infections were self-reported rather than laboratory-confirmed. This summary relies on the supplied abstract and metadata; the full paper is required for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

This article was identified through classifier links to COVID-19, SARS, vaccination topics, and the Netherlands geographic context. These links assist in literature discovery and thematic organization but do not indicate that this research was triggered by or confirms a specific surveillance signal.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 9 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied instudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design