Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessCOVID-19SARS

Effectiveness of seasonal mRNA COVID-19 vaccination against post COVID-19 condition between July 2023 and September 2024 among adults aged ≥ 60 years in Germany: a population-based cohort study

BMC Infectious Diseases·

Nita Perumal, Caroline Peine, Annika Steffen, Ole Wichmann, Thomas Harder

DOI
10.1186/s12879-026-13803-8
PMID
42288736
PMCID
PMC13264817
OpenAlex
Study type
Cohort study
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The findings address vaccine-preventable PCC burden in a high-risk age group during the first post-pandemic season and are positioned as input for vaccination policy, communication, and clinical decision-making.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study investigated whether a single dose of seasonal mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during the 2023/2024 season was associated with reduced risk of post COVID-19 condition (PCC) over the following six months in older adults.

Study design

A retrospective, population-based cohort study using nationwide German outpatient claims data, analyzed with descriptive methods and Poisson regression.

Population and setting

Adults aged 60 years and older in Germany, with a total cohort of 19,121,674 individuals followed in routine outpatient care.

Main findings

PCC incidence during follow-up was low (0.2%). Vaccinated patients (18.0% of the cohort) were older (median 75 years vs. 71 years) and more often female (54%) than unvaccinated patients. One vaccine dose was associated with an adjusted risk ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.36-0.39) for PCC diagnosis at six months post-vaccination, corresponding to a vaccine effectiveness of 63%.

Public-health relevance

The findings address vaccine-preventable PCC burden in a high-risk age group during the first post-pandemic season and are positioned as input for vaccination policy, communication, and clinical decision-making.

Important limitations

Limitations are not explicitly enumerated in the supplied abstract; the summary is therefore restricted to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata, and the original paper is needed for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

Indexed under COVID-19, Germany, vaccination, and vaccine effectiveness, the article is discoverable for audiences seeking evidence on post-pandemic PCC prevention in older adults; it should not be interpreted as confirmation of a live surveillance signal.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 11 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventioninforms policy domainstudied instudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design