Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessSARSCOVID-19

Surveillance and return to work of healthcare workers following SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection, Sheffield, England, 17 January to 7 February 2022

Eurosurveillance·

Mohammed Raza, Prosenjit Giri, Subhashis Basu

DOI
10.2807/1560-7917.es.2022.27.11.2200164
PMID
35301977
PMCID
PMC8971920
OpenAlex
W4220669528
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The findings support shortened isolation policies for healthcare workers infected with Omicron, potentially helping to maintain healthcare workforce capacity during periods of high transmission while minimizing workplace spread.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study evaluated whether shortened COVID-19 isolation periods allow healthcare workers infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant to return to work safely while maintaining adequate staffing levels.

Study design

Surveillance study of healthcare workers following SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, conducted in Sheffield, England between 17 January and 7 February 2022.

Population and setting

240 healthcare workers at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, England, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant during the study period.

Main findings

Among the healthcare workers studied, 55% could return to work before day 10 of isolation, with over 25% eligible for return by day 6, contingent on two consecutive negative antigen tests.

Public-health relevance

The findings support shortened isolation policies for healthcare workers infected with Omicron, potentially helping to maintain healthcare workforce capacity during periods of high transmission while minimizing workplace spread.

Important limitations

This summary relies on the supplied single-article abstract and metadata. Full assessment of study limitations, including sample representativeness, testing protocol details, and follow-up for secondary transmission, requires review of the complete published paper.

GIDS interpretation

This peer-reviewed journal article is discoverable through GIDS classifiers for COVID-19, SARS, outbreak investigation, surveillance, and transmission dynamics. It addresses a policy-relevant question about return-to-work protocols during the Omicron wave in a healthcare setting.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 10 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topichas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenstudies populationuses study design