Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessTuberculosisHepatitis BHepatitis CHepatitis DDiphtheriaInfluenzaHepatitis A

Preventing and Controlling Emerging and Reemerging Transmissible Diseases in the Homeless

Emerging Infectious Diseases·

Sékéné Badiaga, Didier Raoult, Philippe Brouqui

DOI
10.3201/eid1409.080204
PMID
18760000
PMCID
PMC2603102
OpenAlex
W2106292146
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Homelessness is described as an increasing public health problem, and the authors call for national public health programs specifically addressing homeless populations.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

This review examines intervention measures for controlling and preventing common transmissible infections in homeless populations.

Study design

This is a summary review of intervention measures reported as efficient for infection control in homeless populations.

Population and setting

The target population is homeless persons, who experience poor living conditions and limited healthcare access that increase exposure to communicable infections.

Main findings

Street- or shelter-based interventions tailored to specific homeless subgroups are identified as most efficient. Effective measures include education, free condom distribution, needle prescription programs, tuberculosis screening and directly observed therapy, improved hygiene for clothing and bedding, and widespread ivermectin use for scabies and lice. Systematic vaccination against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, influenza, pneumococcus, and diphtheria is strongly recommended.

Public-health relevance

Homelessness is described as an increasing public health problem, and the authors call for national public health programs specifically addressing homeless populations.

Important limitations

This summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata. The abstract does not specify the scope, quality, or recency of the evidence reviewed, nor does it report outcome measures or effect sizes for the interventions described. Decision-grade interpretation requires the full paper.

GIDS interpretation

The classifier linked this article to hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tuberculosis, diphtheria, and influenza under treatment and vaccination topics, reflecting its scope as a review of preventive and control measures for infections disproportionately affecting homeless populations. It does not report new outbreak or surveillance data.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 12 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design