Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessTuberculosis

Pulmonary tuberculosis or nocardiosis? A clinical case discussion

Tuberculosis and socially significant diseases·

T. V. Umpeleva, E. I. Kildyusheva, E. A. Ovchinnikova, S. N. Skornyakov, D. V. Vakhrusheva

DOI
10.54921/2413-0346-2026-14-1-60-65
PMID
PMCID
OpenAlex
W7203568651
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
In-Trend
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The case demonstrates that diseases with clinical and radiological features resembling tuberculosis may require molecular diagnostic methods beyond standard microbiological techniques to establish correct etiology and guide appropriate treatment.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The article examines whether advanced microbial identification techniques can distinguish pulmonary nocardiosis from tuberculosis in cases lacking bacteriological confirmation.

Study design

This is a clinical case report describing diagnostic evaluation of a single patient initially diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis without bacteriological confirmation, using microbial marker mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA sequencing.

Population and setting

The study presents one patient diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis lacking bacteriological confirmation who underwent further diagnostic testing.

Main findings

Microbial marker mass spectrometry detected 10-methyloctadecanoic acid, a marker of Mycobacteriales, in sputum and bronchial lavage samples. Subsequent 16S rRNA sequencing identified Nocardia cyriacigeorgica DNA, indicating nocardiosis rather than tuberculosis.

Public-health relevance

The case demonstrates that diseases with clinical and radiological features resembling tuberculosis may require molecular diagnostic methods beyond standard microbiological techniques to establish correct etiology and guide appropriate treatment.

Important limitations

This summary relies on the supplied single-article abstract and metadata. As a single case report, generalizability is inherently limited. Full assessment of diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and methodological details requires review of the complete published article.

GIDS interpretation

This article would be discoverable through tuberculosis surveillance queries based on its title, abstract content, and disease classifier link, though the case ultimately represents nocardiosis misdiagnosed as tuberculosis. The article addresses differential diagnosis rather than tuberculosis epidemiology or transmission.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 7 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionevaluates interventionstudied population settinguses study design