Why healthcare workers are sick of TB
International Journal of Infectious Diseases·
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.003
- PMID
- 25809771
- PMCID
- —
- OpenAlex
- W2107309301
- Study type
- Journal article
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Article type
- journal-article
- Integrity
- current
Why this research matters now
The viewpoint identifies healthcare-worker protection and workforce availability as public health concerns and proposes infection-control, diagnostic, treatment, and stigma-reduction measures. These implications are presented as the authors' recommendations rather than as effects evaluated by the paper.
Structured evidence summary
Research question
The viewpoint examines the belief that healthcare workers are protected from tuberculosis, factors associated with their risk of tuberculosis and drug-resistant tuberculosis, and the stigma and non-disclosure associated with occupational disease.
Study design
This is a viewpoint paper rather than a reported primary research study.
Population and setting
The discussion concerns healthcare workers, illustrated by the reported experience of Dr Thato Mosidi. The supplied abstract does not define a study sample, geographic setting, or recruitment method.
Main findings
The paper states that healthcare workers may face increased risk of tuberculosis, including drug-resistant disease, and describes occupational stigma as contributing to non-disclosure. It calls for improved diagnostics and treatment, stronger infection control, and interventions addressing stigma and discrimination.
Public-health relevance
The viewpoint identifies healthcare-worker protection and workforce availability as public health concerns and proposes infection-control, diagnostic, treatment, and stigma-reduction measures. These implications are presented as the authors' recommendations rather than as effects evaluated by the paper.
Important limitations
The supplied evidence identifies the article as a viewpoint and does not provide an evaluated study sample, methods, comparative analysis, or quantified estimates. This summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata; the original paper is required for decision-grade interpretation.
GIDS interpretation
The article is discoverable as a tuberculosis publication concerning healthcare-worker risk, antimicrobial resistance, diagnostics, transmission dynamics, and treatment. The supplied article does not establish or confirm any live surveillance signal.
Related GIDS surveillance
Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.
Evidence relationships
This article has 10 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.