Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessChikungunya

Evidence of chikungunya virus reinfection in two patients with lupus during the 2024–2025 outbreak on Reunion Island

Open Forum Infectious Diseases·

Anissa Desmoulin, Dimitri Kornblum, Marie-Christine Jaffar-Bandjee, Etienne Frumence, Aurélie Foucher, Patrice Poubeau, Johan Benhard, Patrick Gérardin, Emilie Mosnier

DOI
10.1093/ofid/ofag534
PMID
PMCID
OpenAlex
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The observations suggest that assumptions of durable chikungunya immunity may not hold universally, which could inform risk communication and clinical management for vulnerable groups during outbreaks.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study examines whether chikungunya virus reinfection can occur in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus during the 2024–2025 Reunion Island outbreak, questioning the paradigm of prolonged post-infection immunity.

Study design

A descriptive report identifying one confirmed and one probable reinfection case among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus during a defined outbreak period.

Population and setting

Two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who experienced chikungunya virus infection during the 2024–2025 outbreak on Reunion Island.

Main findings

One confirmed and one probable reinfection were identified in lupus patients, suggesting that reinfection may occur in specific populations and pointing to a more complex pathophysiology than prolonged sterilizing immunity.

Public-health relevance

The observations suggest that assumptions of durable chikungunya immunity may not hold universally, which could inform risk communication and clinical management for vulnerable groups during outbreaks.

Important limitations

The summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract/metadata and requires the original paper for decision-grade interpretation; explicit limitations such as sample size, diagnostic criteria, or immunological workup are not stated in the abstract.

GIDS interpretation

Indexed under chikungunya and outbreak investigation; discoverability is supported by disease and topic classifier links, which may aid retrieval during outbreak-related literature surveillance.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 6 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topichas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design