Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessSalmonellosis

Salmonella and the chicken: reflections on salmonellosis and its control in the United Kingdom

Poultry Science and Management·

Paul Wigley

DOI
10.1186/s44364-024-00001-y
PMID
PMCID
OpenAlex
W4401798478
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Mitigating poultry-associated infections remains essential for community safety, although evolving pathogen traits highlight the need for updated mitigation frameworks. Sustained evaluation of control protocols supports ongoing protection against foodborne transmission.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The article explores how Salmonella maintains persistence in poultry populations and assesses current strategies to limit related foodborne diseases.

Study design

This publication operates as a narrative review that synthesizes existing literature on bacterial ecology and agricultural mitigation practices.

Population and setting

The discussion centers on commercial chicken operations focused on meat and egg production within European and United Kingdom regions.

Main findings

Salmonella utilizes multiple physiological adaptations to survive gastrointestinal conditions and infiltrate developing eggs. Existing interventions like immunization and improved sanitation have decreased human cases but cannot fully prevent outbreaks due to emerging resistant lineages and unvaccinated serotypes. Effective management combines biological insights with continuous monitoring and targeted risk assessments.

Public-health relevance

Mitigating poultry-associated infections remains essential for community safety, although evolving pathogen traits highlight the need for updated mitigation frameworks. Sustained evaluation of control protocols supports ongoing protection against foodborne transmission.

Important limitations

As a reflective synthesis, the work does not present original experimental data or statistical comparisons. Control outcomes differ across bacterial strains and regional farming practices, which restricts universal application of any single intervention.

GIDS interpretation

The manuscript situates established ecological factors and monitoring requirements within broader agricultural health discussions. It frames routine surveillance and adaptive planning as foundational references for future intervention development without referencing active outbreak tracking.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 7 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionstudied instudied population settinguses study design