Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessCOVID-19

The CDC’s management and COVID-19 vaccine recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic: A healthcare worker’s perspective

PLOS One·

Gail C. D’Souza-Rushton, Uttara Seshu, Liba Blumberger, Laraib Mazhar, Jessica M. Yingst, Jonathan Foulds, William A. Calo, Casey N. Pinto

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0354686
PMID
PMCID
OpenAlex
Study type
Commentary
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The findings are framed as informing future CDC messaging during outbreaks, recommending that communication be free from perceived political bias and grounded in evidence-based information shared with healthcare workers.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study investigated healthcare workers' perceptions of CDC management of the COVID-19 pandemic and its vaccine recommendations, and explored how such views related to vaccination status.

Study design

An online cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers in Pennsylvania conducted between August 2022 and February 2023.

Population and setting

580 healthcare workers aged 21 and older in Pennsylvania who reported their COVID-19 vaccination status and timing of first dose; the sample was 83% female and 92% White, with 71% providing direct care and 57% living in suburban areas.

Main findings

Healthcare workers reported mixed perceptions of CDC pandemic management and vaccine guidance. Positive views emphasized clear communication, a science-driven approach, and crisis response for management, and timely distribution, accessibility, affordability, and clear communication for vaccines. Criticisms centered on mask overregulation, politicization, and changing policies for management, and on mandates, politicization, perceived weak scientific basis, and inconsistent messaging for vaccines. In the sample, 85% had received at least one vaccine dose.

Public-health relevance

The findings are framed as informing future CDC messaging during outbreaks, recommending that communication be free from perceived political bias and grounded in evidence-based information shared with healthcare workers.

Important limitations

The abstract does not describe explicit study limitations; accordingly, this summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and bibliographic metadata, and the original paper is required for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

This single article addresses healthcare workers' perceptions of pandemic guidance and vaccination messaging. It is not connected here to any live surveillance signal, and any discoverability or contextual use should be evaluated against current GIDS sources separately.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 8 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenstudies populationuses study design