Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedMonkeypox

Emerging infectious diseases (Mpox, Nipah, and Andes): A narrative review of transmission, environmental survival, and disinfection.

American journal of infection control·

Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Baller A, Brewer B, Sickbert-Bennett EE

DOI
10.1016/j.ajic.2026.06.003
PMID
42556944
PMCID
OpenAlex
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Publisher unavailable
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The review highlights that rapid identification of suspected cases and adherence to infection prevention recommendations are needed to prevent healthcare-associated transmission of these emerging viruses.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The narrative review examines transmission, environmental survival, and disinfection considerations for Mpox, Nipah virus, and Andes virus, with emphasis on infection prevention.

Study design

Narrative review summarizing epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, environmental survival, and disinfectant susceptibility for three emerging viruses.

Population and setting

No specific human study population or geographic setting is described; the review addresses the three pathogens broadly with relevance to healthcare settings given the focus on nosocomial and healthcare-associated transmission.

Main findings

All three viruses are reported to survive in the environment and to support indirect transmission. As enveloped viruses, they are described as susceptible to commonly used antiseptics and surface disinfectants.

Public-health relevance

The review highlights that rapid identification of suspected cases and adherence to infection prevention recommendations are needed to prevent healthcare-associated transmission of these emerging viruses.

Important limitations

No explicit limitations are stated in the supplied abstract. The summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract/metadata and requires the original paper for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

Within the GIDS literature evidence workflow, this peer-reviewed narrative review is discoverable through classifier links to Mpox and to climate/environment, transmission dynamics, and treatment topics, providing contextual background on environmental survival and disinfection rather than a live surveillance signal.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 9 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design