Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessEbolaCOVID-19Hemorrhagic Fever

Willingness to receive Ebola vaccines among pregnant and lactating women in Kampala, Uganda: insights from a post-outbreak cross-sectional study

Vaccine·

Elizabeth B. Katana, Daniel Kiiza, Eva Agnes Laker Odongpiny, Brenda N. Simbwa, Edirisa J. Nsubuga, Josephine Namayanja, Richard Muhindo, Barbara Castelnuovo, Alex R. Ario, Catriona Waitt

DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128737
PMID
42172692
PMCID
OpenAlex
W4412149499
Study type
Cross-sectional study
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Results underscore the necessity of incorporating maternal populations into emergency immunization protocols while simultaneously deploying targeted educational initiatives to mitigate safety concerns and knowledge deficits.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The investigation sought to determine the proportion of expectant and nursing mothers prepared to accept an Ebola immunization and to identify demographic or experiential factors linked to their decisions.

Study design

A cross-sectional survey utilizing a modified World Health Organization questionnaire was administered to collect self-reported data, followed by multivariable statistical modeling.

Population and setting

Participants consisted of pregnant and lactating individuals accessing routine maternal healthcare services at a major referral facility in Kampala, Uganda.

Main findings

Slightly more than half of the cohort reported readiness to undergo immunization. Statistical analysis linked higher acceptance rates to previous coronavirus vaccination history and a distinct preference for injection-based delivery over oral options. Primary reservations centered on anticipated adverse reactions and insufficient public knowledge regarding available prophylactics.

Public-health relevance

Results underscore the necessity of incorporating maternal populations into emergency immunization protocols while simultaneously deploying targeted educational initiatives to mitigate safety concerns and knowledge deficits.

Important limitations

The supplied material lacks explicit methodological constraints or generalizability statements. Therefore, this summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract/metadata and requires the original paper for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

This record offers contextual information regarding immunization acceptance patterns within a defined demographic following a regional viral event, which may assist in mapping historical acceptance trends without implying current outbreak monitoring activity.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 16 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied instudied population settingstudies pathogenstudies pathogenstudies populationstudies populationstudies populationuses study design