Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedHistorical baselineDengue

Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever.

Lancet (London, England)·

Rigau-Perez JG, Clark GG, Gubler DJ, Reiter P, Sanders EJ, Vorndam AV

DOI
10.1016/s0140-6736(97)12483-7
PMID
9752834
PMCID
OpenAlex
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Publisher unavailable
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

A Lancet-era clinical and public-health synthesis for dengue and severe dengue.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

What clinical and public-health features defined dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever?

Study design

Clinical and epidemiologic review.

Population and setting

This field has not yet received a quality-gated evidence summary. Consult the original article.

Main findings

This field has not yet received a quality-gated evidence summary. Consult the original article.

Public-health relevance

Supports historical interpretation of dengue case definitions, clinical severity, and surveillance priorities.

Important limitations

Limitations could not be fully assessed from the available metadata.

GIDS interpretation

Use as historical clinical context alongside modern dengue guidance.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 7 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionevaluates interventionuses study design