Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessCOVID-19Influenza

Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful strategies to increase vaccine intention and improve vaccine uptake for U.S. adult populations in the Affordable Care Act era (2010-2025): a systematic review and meta-regression

Vaccine·

Amanda A. Hensley, Kristina A. Jiles, Samantha Edwards, Claudia Clinchard, Kathy Hosig

DOI
10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128910
PMID
42430872
PMCID
OpenAlex
W7167884539
Study type
Systematic review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

Highlights how logistical and organizational modifications can address persistent immunization gaps even after financial barriers are removed.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

Identifies which intervention approaches successfully enhance immunization intent and administration rates among American adults following recent healthcare policy shifts.

Study design

Functions as a peer-reviewed systematic review and meta-regression that applied PRISMA 2020 standards, dual reviewer screening, and GRADE certainty evaluations.

Population and setting

Encompasses American adult cohorts participating in influenza and coronavirus immunization initiatives across various administrative environments.

Main findings

Network-based recruitment and clinical service enhancements correlated with increased immunization participation. Emergency-period on-site distribution models showed reduced association with participation metrics. Collaborative frameworks consistently yielded superior engagement outcomes compared to isolated messaging efforts.

Public-health relevance

Highlights how logistical and organizational modifications can address persistent immunization gaps even after financial barriers are removed.

Important limitations

Authors acknowledge low to moderate certainty levels and emphasize requirements for more rigorous, equity-oriented investigations. This evaluation depends entirely on the provided abstract and metadata, necessitating the full manuscript for comprehensive analytical verification.

GIDS interpretation

Serves as a reference point for understanding historical intervention patterns within academic literature repositories. Cataloging this work aids contextual tracking of strategy evolution without indicating active epidemiological monitoring.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 8 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied instudied population settingstudies pathogenuses study design