Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessHerpangina

Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of an Enterovirus 71 Vaccine in China

New England Journal of Medicine·

Fengcai Zhu, Wenbo Xu, Jielai Xia, Zhenglun Liang, Yan Liu, Xuefeng Zhang, Xiaojuan Tan, Ling Wang, Qunying Mao, Junyu Wu, Yuemei Hu, Tianjiao Ji, Lifei Song, Qi Liang, Baomin Zhang, Qiang Gao, Jingxin Li, Shenyu Wang, Yuansheng Hu, Shanru Gu, Jianhua Zhang, Genhong Yao, Jianxiang Gu, Xushan Wang, Yuchun Zhou, Changbiao Chen, Minglei Zhang, Minquan Cao, Junzhi Wang, Hua Wang, Nan Wang

DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1304923
PMID
24571754
PMCID
OpenAlex
W2013339538
Study type
Randomised controlled trial
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The trial addresses EV71, identified in the abstract as a major cause of outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina, in a large pediatric population in China.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

Whether an EV71 vaccine protects infants and young children against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina.

Study design

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial with 1:1 allocation, two intramuscular doses 28 days apart, and 12-month surveillance.

Population and setting

10,007 healthy infants and young children aged 6 to 35 months enrolled in China.

Main findings

EV71-associated disease occurred in 0.3% of vaccine recipients versus 2.1% of placebo recipients over 12 months, with reported vaccine efficacy of 94.8% (95% CI 87.2 to 97.9) against EV71-associated hand, foot, and mouth disease or herpangina. The abstract also notes that the safety and immunogenicity profile was evaluated, with the reported conclusion stating that the vaccine provided protection in this population.

Public-health relevance

The trial addresses EV71, identified in the abstract as a major cause of outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease and herpangina, in a large pediatric population in China.

Important limitations

The supplied abstract does not enumerate explicit study limitations. Accordingly, this summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata and would require the original paper for decision-grade interpretation.

GIDS interpretation

The paper is indexed under hand, foot, and mouth disease/herpangina, vaccination, vaccine effectiveness, surveillance, and treatment in China, which may aid discoverability for reviewers tracking EV71-related evidence; no connection to a live surveillance signal is made here.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 13 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied instudied population settingstudies populationstudies populationuses study design