Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessChikungunyaQ fever

Modelling the risk of transfusion transmission from travelling donors

BMC Infectious Diseases·

Tonderai Mapako, Welling Oei, Marinus van Hulst, Mirjam E. Kretzschmar, Mart P. Janssen

DOI
10.1186/s12879-016-1452-z
PMID
27038919
PMCID
PMC4818889
OpenAlex
W2324262540
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The model provides decision-makers with quantitative estimates of past versus future transfusion transmission risk from traveling donors, supporting evidence-based decisions about public communication and blood safety interventions during emerging disease outbreaks.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study aimed to extend the EUFRAT methodology to quantify transfusion transmission risk from donors who traveled to areas with emerging infectious disease outbreaks.

Study design

A generic mathematical model was developed to estimate transfusion transmission risk from traveling donors, distinguishing projected future transmissions from those already occurred. The model was illustrated using historical outbreak data from chikungunya in Italy (2007) and Q fever in the Netherlands (2007-2009).

Population and setting

The model applies to blood donors who traveled to emerging infectious disease risk areas. Illustrative applications focused on donors potentially exposed during the 2007 chikungunya outbreak in Italy and the 2007-2009 Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands.

Main findings

For the chikungunya outbreak, early intervention at week 7 (after 19% of cases) would have prevented only 41% of expected transmissions at that time. For Q fever, even at the end of the third annual outbreak peak, 47% of chronic Q fever transmissions could still be prevented.

Public-health relevance

The model provides decision-makers with quantitative estimates of past versus future transfusion transmission risk from traveling donors, supporting evidence-based decisions about public communication and blood safety interventions during emerging disease outbreaks.

Important limitations

This summary relies on the supplied abstract and metadata from a single modeling study. The model's performance depends on outbreak parameter estimates and assumptions about donor travel patterns. Full assessment of model validation, sensitivity analyses, and operational constraints requires review of the complete published article.

GIDS interpretation

This article is discoverable through searches for transfusion safety, travel-associated disease transmission, and outbreak response modeling. The chikungunya and Q fever classifiers reflect the illustrative case studies used to demonstrate the model, not an assessment of current transmission risk.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 12 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topichas pathogen typestudied instudied instudied population settingstudies pathogenstudies populationuses study design