Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessYellow fever

Spread of yellow fever virus outbreak in Angola and the Democratic Republic of the Congo 2015–16: a modelling study

The Lancet Infectious Diseases·

Moritz U G Kraemer, Nuno R Faria, Robert C Reiner, Nick Golding, Birgit Nikolay, Stephanie Stasse, Michael A Johansson, Henrik Salje, Ousmane Faye, G R William Wint, Matthias Niedrig, Freya M Shearer, Sarah C Hill, Robin N Thompson, Donal Bisanzio, Nuno Taveira, Heinrich H Nax, Bary S R Pradelski, Elaine O Nsoesie, Nicholas R Murphy, Isaac I Bogoch, Kamran Khan, John S Brownstein, Andrew J Tatem, Tulio de Oliveira, David L Smith, Amadou A Sall, Oliver G Pybus, Simon I Hay, Simon Cauchemez

DOI
10.1016/s1473-3099(16)30513-8
PMID
28017559
PMCID
PMC5332542
OpenAlex
W2566415269
Study type
Mathematical modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The findings provide estimates for prioritising areas for vaccination during yellow fever outbreaks and demonstrate the potential for predictive modelling to guide targeted vaccine allocation, though practical implementation would require consideration of vaccine supply and delivery constraints.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The study aimed to understand the spatial spread of the 2015–16 yellow fever outbreak in Angola and the Democratic Republic of the Congo to inform optimal use of limited vaccine supplies.

Study design

This was a mathematical modelling study that jointly analysed datasets describing the yellow fever epidemic, vector suitability, human demography, and mobility patterns in central Africa. A standard logistic model and Cox proportional hazards model were used to infer district-level infection risk and sustained transmission risk, respectively.

Population and setting

The study examined the yellow fever outbreak spanning Angola and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with initial spread traced from Luanda, Angola. Analysis covered 313 districts in the region, with cases reported across 49 districts within the first 3 months of the epidemic.

Main findings

Early outbreak spread exhibited rapid exponential growth with a 5–7 day doubling time and quick spatial expansion from Luanda. Early invasion was positively correlated with population density (Pearson's r 0.52) and inversely correlated with distance from Luanda (Pearson's r 0.60). Higher district population density was associated with increased risk of sustained transmission (hazard ratio 0.74 per log-unit increase). A mobility and vector-suitability model discriminated high-risk districts with high accuracy (AUC 0.94). Retrospective analysis indicated that targeting 50 of 313 districts would have identified 84% of eventually affected districts.

Public-health relevance

The findings provide estimates for prioritising areas for vaccination during yellow fever outbreaks and demonstrate the potential for predictive modelling to guide targeted vaccine allocation, though practical implementation would require consideration of vaccine supply and delivery constraints.

Important limitations

The authors note that insights require integration with constraints such as vaccine supply and delivery logistics before translation into policy. This summary is limited to the supplied single-article abstract and metadata; full interpretation requires review of the original paper.

GIDS interpretation

This modelling study characterises historical outbreak dynamics from 2015–16 and provides retrospective estimates of potential vaccination targeting. It does not represent current surveillance data or an active signal, but may inform understanding of factors contributing to yellow fever spread in this geographic region for context only.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 13 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typeinforms policy domainstudied instudied instudied population settinguses study design