Global search

Find data and evidence

Type at least 2 characters. Use arrow keys to review and Enter to open.

Peer reviewedOpen accessDengueMalaria

A new dengue vaccine (TAK-003) now WHO recommended in endemic areas; what about travellers?

Journal of Travel Medicine·

David O Freedman

DOI
10.1093/jtm/taad132
PMID
37847608
PMCID
OpenAlex
W4387701172
Study type
Journal article
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Article type
journal-article
Integrity
current

Why this research matters now

The article addresses practical implications of WHO dengue vaccine recommendations for international travelers, providing guidance on vaccine use stratified by prior exposure status. This informs travel medicine practice and pre-travel consultation protocols.

01

Structured evidence summary

Research question

The article addresses the applicability of the WHO-recommended dengue vaccine TAK-003 (Qdenga) for travelers, distinguishing between those with prior dengue exposure and dengue-naïve individuals.

Study design

This is a commentary or perspective piece published in a peer-reviewed travel medicine journal discussing vaccine policy implications.

Population and setting

The discussion focuses on travelers from dengue non-endemic countries, distinguishing between those with previous travel-related dengue infection and dengue-naïve travelers planning travel to endemic areas.

Main findings

TAK-003 vaccination is identified as beneficial for travelers with prior dengue infection (any serotype) to prevent secondary infection during future travel to dengue-risk areas. For dengue-naïve travelers, the potential benefit is characterized as lower and vaccine use remains discretionary.

Public-health relevance

The article addresses practical implications of WHO dengue vaccine recommendations for international travelers, providing guidance on vaccine use stratified by prior exposure status. This informs travel medicine practice and pre-travel consultation protocols.

Important limitations

This summary is based solely on the supplied single-article abstract and bibliographic metadata. Full interpretation of the vaccine recommendations, supporting evidence, and clinical decision criteria requires review of the complete article.

GIDS interpretation

This article would be discoverable through GIDS topic filters for vaccination and travel medicine, and through the dengue disease classifier. It provides guidance on applying existing WHO vaccine recommendations to specific traveler populations rather than reporting new epidemiological data.

02

Related GIDS surveillance

Literature context does not validate, explain, or change a surveillance signal. Exact and contextual relationships are shown separately.

03

Evidence relationships

This article has 11 auditable classifier relationships to diseases, places, topics, and study design.

about diseaseabout diseaseaddresses topicaddresses topicaddresses topicevaluates interventionhas pathogen typestudied population settingstudies pathogenstudies populationuses study design